Is TV bad for babies?

topic posted Tue, January 8, 2008 - 10:25 PM by  Ann
I recently discovered hearing that TV is bad for babies? I feel like a bad mommy for not knowing about this one. Me and my fiancee are quite bad about this. We turn on the TV and she sits with us, sometimes sleeping. When I have to get things done around the house, I have Tom watch Annaliese, usually he does this on the couch in front of the TV watching sports! We are so aware and conscious about what we allow here, but I missed this one! TV is bad for babies?
posted by:
Ann
offline Ann
Los Angeles
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Tue, January 8, 2008 - 11:54 PM
    what's bad about it? we watch tv, too. nothing violent or seizure-inducing, just regular shows.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Wed, January 9, 2008 - 12:00 AM
      Yes, the pediatrics association warns about children watching tv before a certain age, I believe age 2. Question yourself. Is tv natural? Is tv wise? Is tv an influence you want on your child? Consider commercials as well. Consumerism, mainstreamism, ect.
      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Wed, January 9, 2008 - 7:58 AM
        This may just be the result of a lot of the research I've done, but as for television being natural or wise, if you really want to teach that lesson to a child, why watch television at all? Why keep it in the house? There are a lot of unnatural things about our modern lifestyle, but that doesn't mean they should be cut out or restricted from our youth.

        However, I definitely agree to the consumerism aspect. Commercials drive me nuts because my daughter sees something on television and immediately asks for it. Thankfully, she prefers to watch shows that have no commercials, like the stuff on Noggin, if you have cable.

        Here's the problem I have with the babies and television thing. I think putting a baby in front of the television instead of offering them interaction is wrong. That being said, my baby does go in his exersaucer in front of the television. Corde gets unrestricted television time, so usually she wants to have it on just for background noise. Of the nearly constant time our television is on, she's only really watches it for an hour each day unless she's sick, but she's got some obsession right now of it being on in the background, so we're working with that. Aris (the baby) has occasionally gotten sucked in, watching television for a whole of five minutes, but then he gets bored and moves on to playing, only to come back and watch later. I personally see nothing wrong with that.

        However, I believe the pediatrics association has issued this warning specifically when it comes to those dvds specifically aimed towards babies, such as Baby Einstein and that sort of thing, where the focus is to teach the baby early language skills. I've heard of mothers that sit their babies down in front of those shows for hours at a time thinking it would make their baby more intelligent and instead the baby doesn't know how to interact with the world around them.

        I personally think there's a difference between sitting with your baby and watching television, and having them watch television. When I have Aris in my lap while I watch a show or movie, he's usually watching me, playing with my fingers or a button, or looking at one of his books. I know he's not going to be interested in some history channel show about mummies at his age, so I try to make sure there's something else there for him. Yes, he may watch for a while because I am, but he also plays, explores, and often sleeps.

        When the television is on, you really can't stop them from watching. The best thing you can do is provide them with other options that would be far more interesting to encourage exploration instead.
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Wed, January 9, 2008 - 4:57 AM
    i think because a baby will end up watching instead of exploring-you know?
    babies don't miss it, don't need it
    give them a box and spoon. interact with the child--that is why they say tv is bad--they are missing the interaction, there by missing some learning.
    don't watch a lot and definately turn it off when done--that is a big problem--the noise muddles the baby's sense and can make it hard to discern or distinguish your voice while it is on. delaying speech understanding and such
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Wed, January 9, 2008 - 8:08 AM
    watching television impairs language development and natural curiosity in young babies and children.

    though, we're the first to admit that by 4:30, especially in the frigid weather, when we need to make dinner and do some of the dishes piled in the sink, that a half hour of sesame street on digital "sprout" on-demand is a sanity saver. it helps knowing that she's zombified in one place for a fixed period of time. a glimpse of the long-term effects of hours of tv are frightening to us.

    start the habit of reading books and listening to music .. keep the tv to a minimum.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Wed, January 9, 2008 - 1:11 PM
      Stephanie, don't mean to be snippy, but can you really support this statement? I am aware that there are tons of studies done on children and TV watching and some of them indicate that these could be possible results, however the direct link has never been proven to my knowledge. We didn't watch much TV when my son was tiny because I was so freaked out by statements like this, but I missed watching movies and things. We don't have cable, don't deal with commercials at this point, but we did start watching movies again. Sam has a few favorite movies he loves. He just started watching The Wizzard of Oz, which has led to him trying to fly like the monkeys and like the wicked witch. He puts a lot of energy and creativity into this. He is the most naturally curious person I know. He's not a young baby any more, but still.

      The difference, of course, is always in how the parents participate. Sure, if you turn on the TV to any old loud thing and leave the baby to his own devices for long stretches of time, he is likely to suffer impaired language and other problems, but this could just as likely be the result of the absence of parental interaction, not the effect of the TV itself, if that makes sense. If a parent is that uninterested in the child, there are a lot of other factors in play. If a parent is snuggling with the child and paying attention to the child and what the child is seeing, I think that can make a difference.

      I guess I just think there's a lot more to this question than at first meets the eye. It's something I've done a lot of reading about lately and here's some good food for thought:
      www.joyfullyrejoycing.com/ Scroll down the left hand menu to the section on television. It's some pretty mind blowing thought provoking stuff.
      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Wed, January 9, 2008 - 5:11 PM
        "Stephanie, don't mean to be snippy, but can you really support this statement?"

        i'm not willing to plop my toddler in front of a tv all day to find out, so no .. i don't have actual proof.

        obviously, folks are going to have to make their own judgments when it comes to tv, but why risk impairing their development with excessive tv watching when it is proven (with like, research papers and stuff) that reading to babies and toddlers increases their language development?


      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Wed, January 9, 2008 - 6:05 PM
        I loved that bit on television (on the joyfully rejoycing site)! It just reinforced everything I've been practicing right along!

        There is a big difference between getting sucked into shows and watching television as quality family time. Corde plays Blue's Clues with her brother. If the baby's by her she'll say "Look, Aris! A clue! Put it our handy-dandy notebook!" We've played Wonderpets together. She even insists the baby gets to be one of the Wonderpets on our walks and thinks of some way he can help rescue the animal, even if it's just that the stroller chases away the monsters or his laughter or something babies can do. After all, Wonderpets is all about team work. Today Aris was fussy and the only thing that would get him to calm down was watching Max and Ruby with Corde. He sat in his saucer staring blankly at the television with his eyelids drooping until his head just dropped and he was out. I tried EVERYTHING and that was the only thing that finally got him to calm down and sleep. Is that a bad thing?

        Most of the problem with television are those movies like...I believe baby Einsteins and that sort of thing, the kind where they play soothing music, show a picture of a ball and say ball several times in different tones, then show something else. Right around the time Corde was born, everyone was subjecting their babies straight from birth to four or five hours of that mindless television every day in order to stimulate the growth of their minds. Several of those children that I knew had social problems as a result because they had very little human interaction. Maybe it would be different if you sat there with the baby saying, "Look, it's a ball! She said ball! She said it again! You hear that? Ball?" but most of the parents I know think the television means they can walk away.

        And if you offer children and babies something constructive to do rather than watching television, their attention won't be kept by it. My son would much rather swing his pacifier around by the clip or roll soda bottles all over the floor than to watch television any day. Children will naturally get bored with television after a while because it interferes with their natural curiosity. However, they take those ideas and bring them into the world with them. Corde loves playing pirates because of Pirates of the Caribbean. Her first make-believe game was ghosts because of a Backyardigan's episode. The only time Corde ever really sits down and watches a whole episode of a show is if she's trying to do it along with the baby or if she's gotten really overwhelmed and needs to settle herself down. While the television is on in our house a lot, the reality of the matter is hardly ever is anyone watching it and we're finally getting to the point where Corde understands that if she turns it off when she doesn't want to watch it, if no one else is watching television, I'll let her turn it on again when she wants to watch it again. It's a process.

        That's the problem with television and babies. There are so many more factors than just babies watching television. There's the socialization issue. There's the problem of people who sit their kids down in front of the television and walk away using that as a babysitter. There's a lot of issues when it comes to babies and televisions.
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Wed, January 9, 2008 - 12:26 PM
    Sticking the baby in front of the TV and ignoring her is probably not a good idea but watching it yourself at a reasonable volumn while you nurse her or she snuggles in your arms isn't automatically harmful. When they are first born that is one of the best ways to get through those marathon nursing sessions. However now that my son is one and pays attention to the TV I do believe at this age it isn't such a great thing and most of the time I turn it off and read stories. I'm not a fan of those Baby Einstein type videos and such. I think they give parents the false impression that we should be trying to cram information into their little brains instead of just letting them learn through natural interactions.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Wed, January 9, 2008 - 4:51 PM
      tv is not the greatest for adults, so I figure it can't be fabulously healthy for kids either. I moved the tv to an upstairs room and rarely visit it with my daughter. However, my brother sent her the first ten years of Sesame Street on DVD, and I have been loving watching those with her. The reality is, at two years old, my daughter is way more interested in reading than she is in television, and I think the main reason for this is just the nature of children. They have brains that are about ten times as active as our own, and need to use them constantly. But I will give some of the credit to myself and my husband for making books available at all times and restricting tv to virtually nil.
      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Wed, January 9, 2008 - 6:10 PM
        Isn't that where a lot of kids behaviors come from? My daughter's television obsession comes from her father watching television near 24-7 when he was a stay at home dad. As a result, she thinks it's a grown up thing to have the television on all day. In a family that would rather spend more time reading, even with unrestricted television time, the kids would probably rather read. Kids are mimics. They do what their parents do. They see their parents reading, and they will read. They see their parents on the computer all the time, they will be on the computer all the time. They see their parents as couch potatoes, they will become couch potatoes themselves. The problem isn't television or video games. The problem isn't the restricting of those things. The problem IS what the parents do. After all, it's only going to be so effective to say "You can't watch television all day" if that's what you do all day. I know that's not a problem here, but it is something to consider. After all, the best way to lead is by example.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Wed, January 9, 2008 - 9:37 PM
      I have a tv in my home but I do not have cable or even bunny ears so we get no channels. It is actually in the closet and occasionally I take it out to watch a movie. I know that tv affects brain development and eye development and the ability to keep oneself entertained because I was a child who was sat in front of the tv a lot. I have had to do some serious work to strengthen my eyes so that I could focus better without them getting tired. Anaya doesn't watch tv and has no interest even when there is something on. Occasionally when we are at a friends house and her kids are playing video games she gets into it. I won't ban her from it completely but i will promote her choosing something else for the most part and only watching things on occasion when it's something she really wants to see.
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Thu, January 10, 2008 - 11:01 AM
    well, whats going to happen if you hold your baby and snuggle while your watching t.v.? seriously?
    it's one thing to plop your child in front of the t.v. and ignore him. but holding him and watching t.v. is absolutely different.
    i've only read about the studies for above three.

    if you're really concerned research the studies that were done and make your opinion on that. not sensationalism.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Wed, January 30, 2008 - 11:30 PM
      Tv is very bad for babies, kids and adults as well !

      It's not what they watch ..it's the act of watching. Instead if doing something creative, playing in nature, or participating with life in a meaningful way they sit in front of the tv for hours on end passively watching images flicker before them. Even so called educational things like nature shows or sesame street are a joke.

      There is no evidence, not a shred that computers or tv help kids learn in any way. To the contrary there is evidence suggesting a negative impact on a childs ability to focus and learn. What they need is to be playing with real people in real life, that is how kids learn about the world.

      Please folks, do not use the tv as a baby sitter !

      For more info, read the books,

      The plug in Drug ~ Lots of great info on studies done showing the impact tv has on growing minds

      Four Arguements For the Elimination of Tv ~ A classic..
      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Thu, January 31, 2008 - 7:04 PM
        Sorry, can't resist responding to this. Here is some evidence, anecdotal coming from real life families, not clinical research, about how TV isn't necessarily the devil in a box:

        www.joyfullyrejoycing.com/influ...v.html
        • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

          Thu, January 31, 2008 - 7:08 PM
          Also scroll down and read more of the TV articles on the same sight or visit this site for some more excellent and thought provoking responses to these kinds of arguments against TV: sandradodd.com/tv

          Ultimately, it's all about a whole life approach to everything, finding balance, meaning and connection and living without fear. I believe this can be done with or without TV.
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Fri, February 1, 2008 - 10:12 PM
    I've heard that screens in general (t.v./computer/ or otherwise) are good to hold off on until the end of the birthing of the child's etheric energy body (imaginative life rhythmic body) which takes place around age 14. After that their astral body births and develops (the soul life), and the child can interact with abstract elements and concepts in a healthy way.
  • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

    Sat, April 5, 2008 - 10:46 AM
    According to brain development experts, violent imagines and sounds on TV actually re-wire the neurons in our brain, in a negative way. This also alters the brain chemistry.

    I grew up with Bugs Bunny and Elmer Fudd and have thought about the influence those shows had on my generation.

    I often see the most violence on Comedy Central. I even see violent commercials on Disney Channel. Every other commercial shows images of killing and fighting. It is easy enough to not pick a show where there is violence, but it is difficult to find the remote when those violent images come up on commercial during a non-violent show.

    I have also read about similar things mentioned by others. TV stunts brain development and language capacity.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Sat, April 5, 2008 - 11:31 AM
      all other philosophies aside, tv's (along with computers and many other electronics) produce electromagnetic radiation that affects all humans, adults and babies alike. tv's are producing emr even without being turned on, even after they're unplugged.

      the AAP recommends zero tv from birth to 2 years old.
      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Sat, April 5, 2008 - 6:41 PM
        Solomon pays no attention the Television. Some of our friends will put on a movie for their toddler and they seem to be interested.
        I don't think educational, visionally stimulating movies are bad. I think it's bad when you rely on television to entertain you baby.
    • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

      Sun, April 6, 2008 - 4:05 PM
      "According to brain development experts, violent imagines and sounds on TV actually re-wire the neurons in our brain, in a negative way. This also alters the brain chemistry. "

      Can you substantiate this?
      • Re: Is TV bad for babies?

        Sun, April 6, 2008 - 7:40 PM
        tv or no tv, people are going to witness violence in some form or another. whether it's their cat killing a bird, or their mother being hit by a mugger, or a fatal accident on the freeway. even in ages past, there were life situations for children to deal with & everyone made it. i'm sure gandhi witnesses his share of terrible things, but he still managed to make a positive difference in the world.
        you can banish television from your home, but kids are going to rebel & watch it at a friend's house anyway. it's impossible to shelter your children from ever experiencing "violence" in the form of actions or words & indeed, i would never want to give my son any false impression of a perfect, peaceful world, because it's not. i don't sit him down in front of the tv for hours on end, but i have some shows i like to watch & he drifts in & out as he chooses. i grew up on television & now consider myself a conservative tv watcher by current societal standards.

Recent topics in "Attachment Parenting"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
rail guards for co-sleeping Lyla 11 June 28, 2008
Co-Sleeping/Crib Sidecar Hack! 6 June 23, 2008
birth petition Grandma 3 June 22, 2008
The Daily Groove Fairy 0 June 3, 2008