Advertisement
I feel this is a very important topic. I for one have chosen not to Vaccinate my children, and for good reason, but before I get into why I want to ask peeps on here where you stand and why?
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 1:38 AMHello all :) This is my first post on this board.
As far as vaccines, I haven't decided. I had my baby get her 2 month shots, and after dealing with her being extra fussy for 2 weeks and reading about how many others are opting out, decided to pass on the 4 month shots and learn all I can before making a decision. I was vaccinated as a kid and I am mostly healthy (though who knows what I could attribute my weight issues to), but it's anyone's guess as to how it might affect me later in life. There's definitely not enough researched on the subject. I'd like to know more before injecting a bunch of viruses into my child.
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 2:07 AMoh, man, you've opened up a whole can o' beans here. this is probably one of the touchiest subjects on any parenting board. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 5:06 AMI enjoyed reading Aviva Jill Romm's book on vaccinations .... I learned quite a bit. My husband is reading it now, and when he's done we'll discuss and decide. -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 11:09 AMa serious can of beans has been opened, as i-dra pointed out. just scroll down the posts in the breastfeeding tribe and/or pp mammas, and you will find TONS of dialouge re: vaccinations.
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 7:14 PMI vaccinated my kids. In my opinion, overall benefits to society outweigh overall risks adjusted for uncertainty blah blah blah blah and I"M RIGHT DAMN IT!!!! -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 9:32 PMI agree with the overall benefits to society but that doesn't mean that I have to vaccinate my kid. The way I see it is that there are enough kids getting vaccinated and enough people who will be vaccinating their yet unborn children that it reduces the risks for my child so that I don't have to. Did that make sense? Well anyway I don't think vaccines for most things are a bad idea, I just am not gonna do it to my kid.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, July 30, 2007 - 9:44 PMfor the record, we are not vaxing, mostly because we're against injecting our little boy with monkey kidneys & rabbit brains (check the ingredients). -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, September 1, 2007 - 1:40 PMaaaaa, I appologize for starting this post and then neglecting it. Between travelling for 3 weeks and coming home to a broken computer I haven't had much time to go online, and since my computer is being sent away for repair today I wont be able to follow up very much either. So I will just leave everyone with a couple great resources.
www.nvic.com
also the book Natural Family Living by Peggy O'mara (Publisher of Mothering Magazine) has a great section on Vaccines. I also reccomend this book to any parent who has babies or small children. It gives good insight to so many topics we face as parents.
:)
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, July 31, 2007 - 7:00 AMour first got routine vaccinations... our second we delayed b/c she's so petite. I don't even know if she finished out her series... I'd have to ask my husband since he keeps up with that stuff lol.
To each his/her own. But as a teacher, realizing how quickly diseases are spread in school settings, I know we'll be getting ours vax'd if we decide to put them into public school. Or even daycare, for that matter! But so far they've never been to daycare. For now we're undecided on the school issue (we'd prefer to home school... but don't know if finances will allow it!)... so I guess we'll see.
Personally I don't think it's all that important... it's just not something I'm very passionate about, although some people seem to get riled up over it on both ends lol. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, July 31, 2007 - 9:20 AMnot vaccinating, though I waffle on tetanus diptheria and polio when she's older.... and personally I believe that it harms society more than it helps (through all the "minor" side effects like increased allergies, ADD, brain damage that can't be proven, sterility cancer immune diseases etc there is just too much weird stuff happening tp us as a species - I just think its a safer bet to minimize all toxic exposure and vaccines areTOXIC) so I'm not counting on any "herd immunity" (which I don't actually believe exists) just good health good food and some luck. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, August 3, 2007 - 11:08 PMI have really good info and stats for those of you still questioning. Vaccinating has links to Autism and childhood cancer.
Life is a bit hecktic right now, I will have stats and links up in the next couple of days.
Book reccomendation : How to Raise a Healthy Family In Spite of Your Doctor. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sun, August 5, 2007 - 7:12 AMJust weighing in to say my boy is not vaccinated at this point--he just turned one (yay!!). I am still pondering whether or not to do some of the vaccines when he gets older and is around more people. If we go that route, I won't do any combo vaccines, will demand thimerosol free, and won't do all the most recent vaccinate-against-every-living-organism vaccines. It is hard for me to reconcile the idea of purposefully injecting toxins into my baby's body in order to protect him, it's like sending troops to kill people so we can have peace (!!!???!!). But I'd also like us to be able to travel and I see some merit in having him protected from some of the more deadly illnesses if that can be achieved without sacrificing the excellent health he has now. I am not convinced that all vaccines are universally bad, and certainly don't think they are all universally good.
If we go that route, we'll go on a case by case, shot by shot basis. I think the thing that really put my back up was when they wanted to vaccinate my brand new baby against Hep B in the hospital--are you kidding me? Well, it probably is appropriate in some circumstances, where babies are for some reason in immediate danger of contracting Hep B, but why universally pump brand new people up with chemicals and toxins they don't need? Aargh. My baby seemed to me so perfect in that moment, so healthy and right, that I couldn't imagine giving him vaccines. It seemed like sacrilege. Now that he's older and becoming more a part of the world around him, it's a different question. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sun, August 5, 2007 - 9:16 AMI think the decision you make also depends where you live. I lived in South Texas for years where around the border towns diseases like whooping cough and tuberculosis aren't uncommon.
I did get my older child vaccinated with certain few but was very choosy about which vaccines she actually got in 1993. Now that she's 14 - I definitely will not allow the HPV vaccine to be given to her (and thank goodness we live in Ohio now - the Governor of Texas made it mandatory for girls 8 years old and up to get the vaccine - no one seems to care Merck the vaccine's producers makes $600 a shot.
Wonder how much it took to line the Gov's pockets to pass that into state law and how long until other states follow suit when they see the money that can be made?
That's a prime example of an unnecessary and untested vaccine.
I now have a 2 yr old and opted out of the Hep-B and chicken pox however I did have him inoculated - but we were absolute in asking thimerosol free only. Because you have to consider if the disease IS a possibility where you live and you can't know the health of everyone your child is exposed to just being out and about doing errands, whatever.... then in that case (at least for us) vaccinations were far better than risking our child contracting the actual disease. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sun, August 5, 2007 - 1:00 PMMost diseases don't scare me at all.
Most of the vaccines pushed on children these days are for pretty harmless illnesses- especially in today's America, where we enjoy great sanitation, clean food to eat, and pure water to drink. I am annoyed that vaccines have reduced their incidence in children, only for adults to be susceptible when the vaccines (the ones that actually work, that is) wear off.
Breastfed children are incredibly resilient, and that is the bottom line. My kids are healthy, so I have no fear of illnesses like whooping cough, chicken pox, measles, etc. If they catch it, they will fight it off, and be stronger for it. In fact, my daughter had WC and it wasn't a big deal, even before we learned about the best treatment for it (sodium ascorbate, by the way)
Nobody vaccinates for TB here anymore- it's that rare, and when it does get spread around, people don't actually contract it because we are well fed and live on clean streets in clean houses. (dirty dishes notwithstanding)
Now that's something nobody talks about: we are exposed to all sorts of scary pathogens all of the time! The trouble is, our myriad success stories pass unnoticed. We don't get sick, so we didn't know we could have.
We're much better off concentrating on nursing our babes, eating whole foods, and getting fresh air and exercise. Making sure my kids eat foods rich in Vitamin A is much more effective (and SAFE) than getting a vaccine against measles.
My babies have no use for injections of nut oils, aborted-baby tissues, egg protein, formaldehyde, thimerosol, and aluminum...
and think of it,
Drug companies would love to see the entire population of the USA getting flu shots every year, but they can't produce enough of them quickly enough to have the supply on hand. The cultures grow very slowly, so once they decide which strains of flu they're going to use, they have to scramble to make enough batches for the shots. Sooo... they're working on getting permission to culture flu bacteria with cancer cells so they will grow more quickly.
And HPV? Yeah, another easy HELL, NO.
Its possible benefits are so tiny, is it worth the chance of dying of a blood clot after getting even one dose?
Unbelievable.
I do wonder what it cost to get the Gov. of Texas on board with that. It doesn't matter how much it was, they bought him cheaply compared with the profits they're making. At our children's expense. (not to mention state and private health care costs)
When I first read How To Raise A Healthy Child, I agreed with some of it, but thought other parts were a little nutty. The more I learn, the more I agree with Mendelson. I should read that book again and see how we line up these days.
An incredible book on the subject:
Just a Little Prick, by Hilary Butler
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sun, August 5, 2007 - 1:07 PMFor me, there were certain ones that I do not want, such as varicella (aka chicken pox), HPV, and influenza vaccines, but I did decide on most of the the vaccinations scheduled so far, with the exception of the Hepatitis B shot, which she will more than likely receive later on.
I consider myself really lucky that I found a Pedi that allows me to decide which vacs I want for my daughter which give me a little bit more breathing room on making a decision (in fact, she agreed with me regarding the Hep B vac).
I should say though, there were two vacs that she did insist on: Hib vaccine and Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccines. In fact, she believed that the use of the Prevnar (the Streptococcus pneumoniae vaccine) could very likely be the reason why she has been having very few emergency room cases lately, which is something good to know. I don't think she has any outside interest except for her patients well being, and will not prescribe antibiotics, unless there is a obvious need for them.
Overall though, I made my decisions on each one on a vaccine by vaccine basis, rather than lumping them all because each disease is different, with different frequencies, and the vaccinations themselves are made of different components. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Wed, September 5, 2007 - 5:16 PMwithout counseling anyone to vaccinate or not (I think it's individual) I have to say that I think the HiB and pnuemonia vaccines are based on fear.
the truth is, many people, including many infants and young children, do NOT have any serious illness from exposure to these common pathogens (and yes, I got an A in microbiology.)
one of my micro professors in fact told us that hemophilus infection is ubiquitous, or it was eleven years ago (vaccien is more common now)...almost everyone, like 90% of population, is seropositive for it my age 20. hmmm...so it's relatively rare that it causes meinigitis or other serious illness. many "nasty colds" turn out, if studied in a lab, to be bacterial or some virus that only occasionally goes ballistic.
same for S. pnuemoniae...I;ve never had pneuonia IN MY LIFE, not as a baby and not as a child or an adult, and I;ve caught plenty of colds over the years (and had all the old childhood viral diseases like chicken pox, measles, rubella, mumps, by age 8.) I;ve also never had systemic strep aureus, the kind that causes strep throat and scarlet fever...my child had it once , at age 4, and that's the one and only time I chose to give her an antibiotic 9and we went with old-fashined penicillin.)
there's this weird and kind of paranoid, in my opinion,modern belief that before antibiolotic and vaccines for every illness, ost people were at death's doorstep every winter, and that's just not the case. ask your parents and grandparents if they are still alive; they grew up fine and got nursed through the basic illnesses,m and probably have more vigorous immune systems as a result.
I had some form of pertussis or parapertussis, as far as I can tell, last January. I had the old DPT series in childhood but it;s acknoledged that pertussis vaccine was never meant to give lifelong immunity; it's there to get children through the most vulnerable period. 9some diseases are more serious in adults, like chickenpox or measles; some more in childhood, like pertussis, which can become whooping cough in babies and tots.)
you gotta decide for yourself and your family, but I just don;t think every parent needs to live in fear of the energency room...my daughter is 13 and has never needed it.
I'm not totally anti-vaccine, jsut have some reservations. I'm studying naturopathy now, FWIW.
judith -
-
Unsu...
Vaccination Ingredients
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 2:39 PMwww.vaccination.inoz.com/ingredie.html
It's true monkey kidneys as well as aborted human fetuses are on that list. -
-
Re: Vaccination Ingredients
Fri, September 7, 2007 - 5:32 PMfor some reason my most recent post with the links is lost inbertween all these posts. here's the post again incase anyone wants to do a bit of research.
------------------
www.nvic.com
also the book Natural Family Living by Peggy O'mara (Publisher of Mothering Magazine) has a great section on Vaccines. I also reccomend this book to any parent who has babies or small children. It gives good insight to so many topics we face as parents.
:) -
-
Unsu...
Re: Vaccination Ingredients
Sat, September 8, 2007 - 12:17 AMwe have decided not to vaccinate Irie until he is at least two, and then go on a case by case basis we definately want the tetnus shot just because of who is father is and we live in the country. I agree that most kids are vaccinated so that one unvaccinated child is not going to cause an epidemic, but let us remember that vaccines erradicated a lot of scary illnesses in this world. We will probably only get him vaccinated for things that could kill him like polio.
However we are planning on adopting our next child and just found out that by law you must vaccinate all adopted children within 30 days of thier arrival in the USA. We are still swallowing this one -
-
Re: Vaccination Ingredients
Sat, September 8, 2007 - 12:26 PM"let us remember that vaccines erradicated a lot of scary illnesses in this world."
Actually, not so much. It's a shame this misperception has managed to endure through the generations,
as the people who were alive in those days have passed on...
www.tetrahedron.org/articles...cacy.html
Most vaccines are for diseases that are not at all scary.
The others are for diseases that are rare, especially in the US, and are still fight-off-able by people who eat well and were breastfed.
It's stunning to discover how good nutrition and proper immune function are inseparable-
but nobody's getting filthy rich helping anyone learn about THAT. -
-
Re: Vaccination Ingredients
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 8:08 AMNote that small pox, which killed an estimated 200-500 million people worldwide in the 20th century is conveniently left out of this article. And many debilitating diseases such as polio and diptheria are only discussed in terms of mortality not morbidity.
Many people didn't die of polio but lived their lives crippled or confined to iron lungs. Medical science could increasingly save their lives, as the article points out. But the article says nothing about repairing or preventing the damage done by this and other "scary illnesses".
Small pox was only erradicated because of vaccination. Polio is only rare in the western world because there's been a tremendous effort made to vaccinate the entire world. If enough people stop vaccinating, it will return.
That isn't to say that we should accept all vaccinations without serious consideration. I, too, wonder if we've gone too far in vaccinating against largely harmess (not entirely harmless) diseases such as chicken pox. -
-
Re: Vaccination Ingredients
Mon, September 10, 2007 - 6:20 PMBlair, I totally agree. Well put.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, September 8, 2007 - 7:17 AMNot to vaccinate!
My son is 4, he is healthy and vibrant, he has never been to see a western doctor, well aside from once when we took him to a western trained doctor who practices homeopathy, we visited him just to establish a relationship, and have a record that my son is in good health.
why not vaccinate? for all the reasons listed here and eleswhere, in other tribes.
the list of ingredients is nauseating!
that alone is enough to keep us far away. eewwh!
-
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 11:18 AM"Small pox was only erradicated because of vaccination. Polio is only rare in the western world because there's been a tremendous effort made to vaccinate the entire world. If enough people stop vaccinating, it will return."
is this true? -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 1:49 PMYes, here is more info.
www.who.int/mediacentre/.../smallpox/en/
www.who.int/mediacentre/...en/index.html
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 3:56 PMre smallpox...well, yes., I believe the vaccine was a success, but that doesn;t mean it;s likely to return unless it;s used as a biological weapon. (the US stillhas some in lockers at the Centers for Disease Control. supposedly important for research purposes, but I can see other, more nefarious uses...) but there is a point at which the risks of continued public health vaccination outwiegh the risks of not vaccinating, which is what happened with smallpox. as a matter of fact, by today's tandards, the risks of the smallpox vaccine would probably be considered unacceptable.
polio, I learned as a student of medical anthropology and public health, goes through stages of endemic/epidemic. it was more porblematic and epidemic, if you will, in my parents' childhood (1920s to 1940s) than my grandparents'. this is verifiable... I'm not even going to say that the campaign for near-unviersal vaccination in the US wasn;t necessary, only that, like smallpox, it's so close to "eradicated" (the few cases that occr annually are NOT generally wild-type!) that I feel it can be regarded much as smallpox was.
it's in the past ten yers or less that the US policy went toward the killed vaccine, which is injected, for polio rahter than the active form, which is MORE immunogenic but also more dangerous. interesting because for years parents who questioned the wisdoma and safety of the live vaccine (polio is spread by fecal-oral transmission...good handwashing and public health wter treatment eliminate a LOT of potential polio!!!) were poo=pooed for being inappropriately vigilant. well, no apology from CDC etc has been forthcoming but the protocals now are for the injectable, killed vaccine instead, because it's sdafer and considered adequate to the task...Europe and japan had alrready switched with no increase in the incidence of polio...
anyway, jsut some facts that show how complex it all is... -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, September 13, 2007 - 6:19 PMit is complex, yes, so i don't really see why the topic needs to be brought up over & over. as far as i can tell, these discussions don't often have positive outcomes. there are 2 very polarized sides to the issue & i've never seen one side convince the other. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 10:50 AMI know what you mean i-dee -- it seams like there's two immovable camps and that these discussions can deteriorate into name calling.
But there's always a new generation of parents out there who need information on the issue. I think every time it comes up I learn a bit more too. Judith's explanation of some of the details of polio filled in some gaps for me.
I don't think Canada does small pox vaccinations anymore -- does anyone know? And I think the goal with Polio is to put it in the same museum-piece state as small pox.
I have to admit that I didn't know how polio is transmitted. But it sure reminded me of watching a woman walking in front of me sneeze into her hand and then use the same hand to open the door that I was about to use. Yikes. We do that all the time. So, as much as we think we're better at hygiene, I'm not sure we really are.
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, September 14, 2007 - 12:59 PMsome of us are somewhere in the middle; as it IS complex; I think that's what I've put out.
I hope no one feels I;ve descended into name-calling or otherwise trashing anyone's POV...not my intention and I believe not where
I took it.
Judith -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 1:10 PMyeah, i guess the two sides of this dichotomy will never see eye to eye.........no sense beating the dead horse. i was just curious about what someone said above about certain diseases coming back if enough people stop vaccinating. not sure i had ever heard that theory before. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 1:38 PMYes, it is soooo true that they will. Whatever you believe that is a fact, It has happened before. -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sun, September 16, 2007 - 2:17 AMdo you have any references or links for this fact?
thank you. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, September 17, 2007 - 7:36 AMwww.nytimes.com/2005/03/09...9polio.html
The thing is, if you stop vaccinating before the virus is eradicated, you give it a chance to break out again. This is a snippet from the article:
"Thought to be on the verge of eradication, the virus recovered in 2004 after officials of three northern Nigerian states stopped vaccinations because of rumors that the vaccine had become contaminated with the AIDS virus, or with pork products or hormones that would render Muslim women infertile."
-
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, September 15, 2007 - 5:23 PMHi Judith! Far from it. This has actually been a very good discussion. Something I like about Tribe is that there does seem to be a great deal of respect for differing opinions.
I was on a real-time chat room once where somebody brought up the subject and it got real hot real quick. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 12:47 AMthanks for that link, blair. i am always open to reading from both sides of the debate. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, September 18, 2007 - 8:00 AMYou're welcome Jennjenn :-) I like to learn about both sides too. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 5:31 PMIt is complex. I honestley don't believe we truely KNOW anything. We may think we know what 9-11 was all about for example. I've heard some CRAZY things that can't just be swept under the rug. The vaccine industry is a billion dollar industry and so I am skeptical when I read stats that support them patially because it's hard to tell who funded these studies and what not. It may be a sad way to veiw the world but I really believe that this planet if full of corruption and we are constantly being fed bullshit. If you want to learn a bit about how our research is presented to the public and how we are presented with statistics shown as facts then may I suggest a book called 'The China Study' by T. Colin Campbell. It's mainly focused on health and diet, but it gives a great explaination on how reseach is presented to the public.
Anywho, I do understand how this could feel like beating a dead horse and all, but I also must say that as a new parent I am happy to be exposed to peoples differening and similar POVs. I can't say I haven't learned a lot just from reading on here. And I do respect tribe for being a possitive name-calling free place to state our thoughts
:)
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 6:58 PMI do scientific research for a living and edit a peer-reviewed scientific journal, so I'm used to going to the sources, looking for conflicts of interest, etc. Yeah, there is corruption and bias, but most researchers do what they do because they love the work and they want to know the truth. If researchers were motivated by greed, they would be working in higher paying fields. So, I hear you that it is tough to weed out the biased studies, but there are some of us who can help with that. Please don't throw the baby out with the bath water. :-) -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, September 21, 2007 - 8:50 PMTotally Chris. I don't mean to come off as so negative. I definetley believe there are a lot of good people out there who follow their passions with concern for others as well. And I am so appreciative. It is really too bad that the corruption has to have us guessing all the time. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, October 6, 2007 - 2:00 PMI had my kids vaccinated ( I live in Australia by the way so I don't know if the immunisations are the same) because I had my father and my partner breathing down my neck to have it done. Also our government is sneaky and you are not allowed to enrol your children in any daycare or school (public or private) without proof they have been immunised...If it was my choice I wouldn;t immunise - they are breastfed and absolutely healthy...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Mon, October 22, 2007 - 10:10 PMWe haven't done any vaccinations and don't plan to anytime soon.
Chicken pox party anyone??!! -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, October 23, 2007 - 9:50 AMi would love a chicken pox party! -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, October 23, 2007 - 10:43 AMWhere are you located?
Send me a message and I can send you links to groups organizing Pox parties most anywhere in the US. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Tue, October 23, 2007 - 5:23 PMthats cool, but Im in Japan.
I seriously doubt I can find one of these here, but i guess i should think more positively, you never know!
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Wed, October 24, 2007 - 10:44 PMhi -
My boy is 5 and we haven't had him vaccinated for anything...yet. We live in Berkeley, California, and can sign a waiver saying vaccinations are "against our beliefs" and so our boy is allowed to go to public school.
I'd love information on groups organizing CPP in our area. Thanks so much!
christina -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, October 25, 2007 - 6:09 PMSure! I'll send you a message.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Wed, October 31, 2007 - 10:21 PMThis is quickly becoming a very sensitive issue for me so I had to chime in on this. When my daughter was born in '05, I had researched and was against vaccination at such an early age but still needed to read more before making a final decision. My mother, an RN, is very pro vaccination and asked me about it when she was born...I said I was not going to have her vaccinated just yet and that when she turned two, I would decide whether or not to vaccinate at all.
My little one is now 2 1/2 and the topic accidentally came up - yeah, I slipped on that one - and I answered honestly telling her that my husband and I decided NOT to vaccinate. She asked why, I explained and even sent her links to some of what I have learned. She called me after reading everything and basically said she was appalled at the lack of proof and credibility AND that I was being irresponsible as a parent. I was aghast. After an brief argument, I ended it by saying that it was obvious that we are not going to agree or change the other one's mind so we should just drop it and move on.
After that, I had not heard from her in a while. We usually talk 2-3 times a week (I am in California and she in Maryland) so I called to say hello....figured she was just busy. That call was horrific....she was distant and cold over the phone as she has never been before exceot when she deals with someone she has major contempt for.
I have also decided not to contact her again. When she is ready to talk, she is going to need to make some huge apologies before we can begin to be close again.
So that is where I stand. -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, November 1, 2007 - 6:04 AM"She called me after reading everything and basically said she was appalled at the lack of proof and credibility AND that I was being irresponsible as a parent."
I researched the anti-vaccine websites and in the ones that I have seen there *is* an appalling lack of credibility and proof. I could see how a concerned grandmother could react like that.
I just hope that the children of parents who don't vaccinate don't ever have any curiousity about visiting second or third world countries where dieseases, that aren't very common here, are very common. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, November 1, 2007 - 4:27 PMThe sources I had were a few of the credible ones as well as links to the pharmecuetical companies inserts for each vaccine which I HAVE READ. I do see a lot of other sites without any credibility and to be frank, I am not that stupid.
If and when my daughter decides to travel abroad, she will be well educated and make informed decisions about vaccines then.
As for my mother, the concerned grandparent, she went too far. I am the mother now and I will continute to educate myself prior to making ANY decision about a drug, vaccine, treatment or remedy. Heaven help the person who tried to deny me that. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, November 1, 2007 - 5:06 PMRight on Debs.
The Centers for Disease Control inadvertently make the greatest case for questioning vaccines.
Their numbers just don't add up on so many things. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, November 1, 2007 - 9:49 PMWhat numbers don't add up? -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, November 2, 2007 - 6:39 AMThe first example that springs to mind:
The CDC (and everyone they give information to) repeat over and over that 36,000 Americans die from influenza every year.
It's a pain to find their reports on specific numbers, separated from pneumonia deaths (which number around 60,000).
When you finally do, you see that actual numbers from the flu range between something like 1,200 and 1,700 per year.
Mostly what opened my eyes were the lists of known side effects (and deaths) for vaccines when compared with the symptoms/possible complications of the diseases they're meant to reduce. That young girls have died from the new HPV vaccine is unacceptable.
If you plan to get a vaccine, read the package insert first. They're supposed to give it to you before they stick you. -
-
Unsu...
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, November 2, 2007 - 8:55 AMFrom what I have heard about the HPV vaccine (and I might not have heard the whole story), of the couple of girls that did die after getting the vaccine, one of the was pregnant (your NOT supposed to get it while pregnant) and the other one or two it seems like they actually dies from other causes.
So what about the flu vaccine? Okay so *if* your numbers are right then the flu isn't as lethal as they reported. I have not heard of one death caused by a flu vaccine (or any other vaccine) in the news though. I *DID* hear in the news very recently of a death caused by bacterial menegitis. Vaccines protect against that. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, November 2, 2007 - 10:18 AM"I have not heard of one death caused by a flu vaccine (or any other vaccine) in the news though."
There have definitely been reports of vaccines resulting in deaths. They are not very common, but they do happen. The thing that concerns me about the flu vaccine in particular, having researched it recently to decide whether or not to give it to my daughter, is that there is a common misconception that a new flu vaccine is manufactured every year. Not true. What is happening is that there a few strains of the virus that cycle through year after year, so the pharm companies simply identify the strain for that year and send out the appropriate vaccine. Now my worry is that we have seen so many examples of diseases growing resistant to our treatments, that I cannot help but wonder what happens when that strain of mostly harmless flu mutates into something a little more dangerous. Flu pandemics are basically just a really nasty strain of a flu virus, and amazingly, there are no vaccines for the really bad ones. I do not feel that sufficient fore thought is put into most actions taken today. We just seem to do what seems convenient and to hell with the many possible futures that result from our actions.
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sun, November 4, 2007 - 8:13 PMbrother in law was just hospitalized for bacterial meningitus - for which he was vaccinated. Nephew had chicken pox after being vaccinated, sister had measles after being vaccinated.
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, November 3, 2007 - 12:13 AMThe CDC flu mortality values are not a case of "actual numbers" versus an error or lie by the CDC. The different values represent entirely different measurements & estimates. The higher values are "flu-related in that they would not have occurred without flu." The lower values are based on the "International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for influenza (ICD9 487)" which "severely undercounts the true number of flu related deaths."
www.bmj.com/cgi/content/...32/7534/177-a
Whether the flu vaccine actually makes a big difference in public health, that's another debate.
-
-
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Thu, November 1, 2007 - 11:05 PM>I just hope that the children of parents who don't vaccinate don't ever have any curiousity about visiting second or third world countries where dieseases, that aren't very common here, are very common.
Too bad more people arnt curious, instead of so fearful. There is a whole new way of looking at life and world out there.
At 4, my son has been to Indonesia 4 times, India 1, Turkey 1, UEA 1, Taiwan 1, Korea 2, USA 5, and we live in Japan.
Unlike many 3rd world childern who are malnourished and living in poverty, my son is healthy and his immune system is strong. I take his wellbeing very seriously, and I would never knowingly put him in a high risk situation.
In all honesty the sickest he has been was on two occassions in the US, when he had a bad stomach ache, and never eleswhere. He did have Rubela at home here, but just a fever and runny nose, his spirit was high and happy the whole time, and now we know he is immune to that. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Fri, November 2, 2007 - 6:53 AMJust to be clear, Japan is not considered a third world country so I doubt risk factor is considered any higher than the US or Iceland, though some of those other countries listed are.
Mexico (where I grew up) is a third world country and I did in fact get measels and rubella as a child. I survived both just fine but I wouldn't sugar coat it as being no problem. Plenty of kids do have problems and complications from those diseases. It is a matter of parents deciding for themselves what they believe is acceptable risk. Personally I am willing to wait to give my child the MMR because I have my doubts about it but I didn't wait on some others.
As a parent it is your choice but please read up on the diseases and the vaccinations....get to know the facts about them and not just through biased web sites. It seems like some folks just read as much as they want to in order to have a dicision they have already made confirmed then they ignore the rest. Go in with an open mind and really absorb the facts.
Also if anyone believes that they have to travel to a third world country for their child to be exposed to a disease then they aren't being realistic at all. Diseases travel with people. There are plenty of people from all over the world in every state and in Canada as well.
And I have to say I hear people from both sides always say the numbers don't add up from the other side or that their facts aren't reliable but rarely have I seen either side provide actual evidence of what they say doesn't compute. Show us some links please.
-
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, November 3, 2007 - 1:35 PMthis post (by Debs about her mother's response to Deb's vaccine choiuces) is very unsettling to me, but part of what I;m hoping to address in my new career in naturopathic medicine.
the type of public health practice, as well as medical practice, I want to encourage is one that is pluralistic and that recognizes that there will be indivuduals and subgroups in every opulation that for religious, personal, or cultural reasons may make choices that are different from those others make. there are certain issues, especially having to do with chidlren's health, on which the varying campos get SOOO strident and opinionated that the other side is demonized. it;s really sad when it;s within the family. (my mother, who does NOT have a background in health services professionally, went kind of ballistic on me out of fear when I told her I was committed to having the home birthing, at age 38, that she knew I;d been planning for since my teen years...so I understasnd how hard it can be.)
I know that in Claifornia, the laws state clearly that, while there are many required vaccines for school entry and continued registration, that the religious or philosophical exemption is ecognized as legitimate by any school authorities. I do wsh there wre a way of working with people NOT legally involved in these decisions to say, "we recognize that there are risks and benefits to every choice we make...and we accept that living with thge real but often minnor risks of living among people whose health choices may be different than our own is one of the liabilities of living in a free society.
I want people to be free to attend chirch services that may not interest me (or may even anger me), watch TV programs that I wouldn't waste tyen minutes of my life following, choose medical treatments that I have rejected for my own family (overuse of antibiotics and many prescription drugs comes to mind)., have forms of anesthesia available for childborth that I personally find risky and unnecessary, ..and I want the same freedoms of how I choose to help my family live.
I think there might be epidemic situations where universal vaccination is called for. I think in the absense of those critical emergencies, there should be considerable choice and opportunity to inform oneself about the pros and cons of various means of disease prevention for the individual AND in the population view (which is the domain of ;public health.)
anyway...I;ve ahd some serious mother issues myself...I;m, almost 51 and my mother is78, and things have mellowed some but not 100%. what I found helped me when I could keep my compusure enough to make it work was to say, "we've got some very different ideas abou..." (whatever...childbirth, vaccines, vegetarian diewt, TV, whatever your family's trigger topics are) and it probably isn;t going to be productive for us to discuss it further. I;d like it if we could find some common grond.
in recent years, my mother HAS apologized about some of her over-reactions to things that really weren;t her business in the first place...maybe not as much as my wounded ego might like, but hey, learning to "agree to disagree" has its merits in family relationships.
I once read a kind of touching piece by a member of theCHiristian Science Church (I dod a college sociology project comparing CHristian Science with newer, more hoilistic forms of mind-bpdy healing to see how they wree alike and how they differed) and the person writing it had to say, "Christian Science parents love their chidlren as much as any parents love their children."
of course they do...sad that because their religious practice involves reliance on prayer instead of medicine and [physiology for healing,m they have felt the need to defend their love for their children. I'm no Christian Scientist and I LOVE the study of physiology (as long as I don;t have to torture animals to do it) but I am rather awed by these people's ebvotion to the principles they hold dear and the ways that they DO love their children...and most of the time, it works, just as a more secular choice against vaccination generally works all right for most of us.
on the home birth thing, I finally had to tell my mother..."I know you think you're looking out for me and my baby, but you need to understand that I'm making this choice out of good information and good ehart, and I believe that home birth is what's healthiest for me and the baby...so please don;t let your fears try to dictate my life. (ast that p;ointm,I;d been studying midwifery in one form or another since my teen ye ars some twenty years earlier...
I did eventually get the apology, byut not because I asked for it or expected it. I think my mother in old age is realizing that she and I are jsut really different people and always have been. once a year or two later, my mother said in an unrelated phone conversation, "so muyc about you is so foreigh to me!" and I was, mercifully for all, undefgensive enough to say, 'well, what you need to remember is that it;s not foreign to me...it IS me."
if your mom relly loves you, and I sus[ect she does, you two will probably find plenty ofcommon ground. vaccines are not the sum total of a person;s health, anbd definitely not the sum total of a person's life.
Judith
-
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, November 3, 2007 - 5:58 AMI'm trying not to get in this debate at all on any forums (I'm in a bunch of online AP groups), but I wanted to mention that there is a new book out that I was extremely impressed with. It's called "The Vaccine Book" by Dr. Robert Sears (son of Dr. William and Martha Sears, who coined the term "Attachment Parenting"). It's well researched, has a lot of information that he received in medical school, is well documented, and informative.
He takes each vaccination on the AAP's schedule separately, talks about the disease (is it serious, is it common, etc), the vaccine, the ingredients, are any controversial, travel concerns, why people get this one, why they don't, and his take on it. He also has chapters that discuss the various ingredients (animal products, aluminum, etc) and offers several selected and delayed schedules. I should point out that this is NOT an anti-vaccine book- he does recommend vaccinations and he does vaccinate children in his clinic (he's a practicing pediatrician). However, he does NOT agree with the AAP's schedule, nor does he think every vaccine is necessary in every situation. The biggest goal of the book seems to be to give the information to the parent, so that they can make the decision, which he, as a doctor, will respect.
As hot as this issue is right now, as well-respected as the Sears family is (this is published in the Sears Family Library of books)- no major bookstore in my area (large metro area) carries this book. I had to buy it on Amazon. But I'm glad I did. I received it about 3 days ago, have already read most of it, and have come up with my own delayed vaccination schedule for my baby due in less than 5 weeks. (My first son is fully vaxxed on schedule, which I don't regret, but I do plan to change the schedule for the new one.)
What impressed me most is that he lists the ingredients for each BRAND of each vaccine. There are major differences between, say, the Glaxo Smith Kline and the Sanofi Pasteur of each vaccination. Since my main concern is the aluminum content, this information is invaluable, since the delayed schedule that I came up with (based on my desire to have my new son fully vaxxed but not to receive toxic levels of aluminum)- my schedule includes the brand of vaccination I wish to have him receive. Now I have to talk to my pedi- since several of the shots I want are ones that he will have to order just for me- they're not the ones that our clinic uses. If he won't order the ones I want for us, we have to find a new pedi before this baby is born. -
-
Re: To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate?
Sat, November 3, 2007 - 6:13 AMCool- I hadn't heard there was a Sears book on Vaccines! I'll have to go get it. It sounds very good.
Chris- thanks for digging that up. It's a topic I haven't seen addressed anywhere else, and it's been bugging me.
-
Unsu...
the vaccine book, by sears
Sat, November 3, 2007 - 6:09 PMit's funny that you mentioned this book, becuse i was just in my local barnes & noble, where i saw it in abundance on the shelf. gonna get me one! -
-
Re: the vaccine book, by sears
Tue, November 6, 2007 - 9:34 AMthanks for the bool recommendation - I just ordered it. I like Dr. Sears. I'm new to tribe so I responded to this but to a post way up in the middle of the conversation. I was saying that my brother in law just had meningitus for which he was vaxed, cousin got the chicken pox and sister got the measles and they were also vaxed. A friend's child got whooping cough. also vaxed. So when I try to puzzle together all this contrasting info, and I am not having an easy time of it, these instances always come to mind. Also, without a doubt, my first child who had all his shots on the AAP schedule definitely gets sick more often is and more ill for a longer time preiod than my non-vaxed 4 year old. I can't help but think his immune system is not as strong because he was injected with all these diseases. Thoughts?
-
-