Advertisement
Why is circumcision considered OK by many people if it is religious. For example someone is against circumcision if it is non-religious, but if it is religious it doesn't bother them the same way. Either way it deeply bothers me. Would I be considered ignorant for not respecting someone religion when I don't think it's a good enough reason to mutilate a baby's penis? Should that trauma be worth it because the parents have certain "beliefs"? I'm just asking for opinions here.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Mon, November 3, 2008 - 10:14 PMMost religious belief stems from an origin of necessity. At the end of the last ice age, between eight and four thousand BC the world as humanity knew changed. Because the Mediterranean Valley filled with sea water (the flood) from the great ice melt, people had to move to the more arid areas east, which is where the middle east is now. For those who went north, it didn't matter so much as the land was not so dry and dusty, but the east and south of what once was Eden, became desert and parts of the body like a foreskin became perfect for infection to fester. The same thing goes for the food that people eat. They may have liked Pigs in the old world, but the new world was only good for sheep and goats. Eventually, simple rules for survival became song and then dogma. Most religious dogma has the same roots in fact. You just have to get through the bigotry to find it.
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 1:40 AMfunny, i just blogged about my experience with circumcision. against my better judgment i went along with tradition. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 6:50 AMI'm jewish but anticirc, I do think really well intentioned intactivists get so shrill they lose their potential audience sometimes. my rabbi friend, Hanan Slll once said the whole world, and the jewish world, was so turned upside down by the Holocaust that as arabbi he totally supported anyone's questioning the rite of religious circ. there's a book called Questioning Circumcision; A Jewish Perspectve, by Ron Goldman (I think, should check the author) that explores a lot of these issues.
need to get going ehre but will gladly join this discussion later: maybe tonight?
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 10:29 AM>> Would I be considered ignorant for not respecting someone religion when I don't think it's a good enough reason to mutilate a baby's penis?<<
In a word, yes.
For Jews, circumcision represents the covenant with Abraham and G-d. In Islam, hadith also mentions circumcision and many Muslims are also circumcised. So are a lot of Orthodox Christians and Copts.
Not your baby. Not your beliefs. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 1:02 PMSo then, I suppose female circumcision is OK since that is also someone's beliefs?
At what point do we draw the line? -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 1:46 PMFulfilling a promise to mutilate someone ELSE is a crime against that person.
from www.jewsagainstcircumcision.org/ :
"To be meaningful, a covenant must be entered into by a consenting adult who intellectually understands the covenant. A newborn baby is incapable of this understanding. Therefore, if a man decides to be circumcised later in life — based on his adult understanding of the covenant — only then is the covenant valid."
"A central purpose of Judaism is tikkun olam, repairing the world. Much of the pain in the world is a result of repeating old harmful patterns of behaviors. Forgoing circumcision contributes to our healing. As we heal from this pain, we will be better able to heal others, and reach our ethical and spiritual potential."
"In the 613 mitzvos, we are commanded to:
* (N 41) Not imprinting any marks on our bodies (Lev. 19:28)
* (N 45) Not making cuttings in our flesh (Deut. 16:1)"
"Brit Shalom is a non-cutting naming ceremony for newborn Jewish boys. It may be performed by a Rabbi or an experienced lay leader. If desired, providers can aid parents in devising their own ceremony. This ceremony replaces Brit Milah (ritual circumcision). It has also been termed Alternative Brit (or Bris), Brit b'li Milah (Covenant without cutting) and Brit Chayim (Covenant of Life). It is similar to the naming ceremony for girls."
Like Judaism, Islam forbids disfiguring the body:
"A body - be it alive or dead - should be respected. It cannot be disfigured at any stage," the Jamiatul Ulama, a council of Muslim theologians in Durban, said on Monday ... the Ulama's Ahmed Kathrada said: "We respect the human body in any form... our primary concern is that we cannot reduce it to disfigurement whether living or dead...".
"Catholics have no religious requirement for circumcision, no medical association in the world recommends it, and most Catholics worldwide do not circumcise their children."
see:
www.catholicsagainstcircumcision.org/
for details.
"Your" baby is not your property to decorate or disfigure.
Do what you will with your own body, but leave that same right to your children.
I think it's possible to show respect to a person while questioning their religious beliefs.
Rather, it is essential: as someone else posted, it's hard to encourage someone to change their mind to your way of thinking when you get so upset that you insult the person you are trying to influence.
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 2:30 PMwell, call me ignorant though i've almost undoubtedly read the same texts as most jews 9my hebrew isnlt all that good though.). I'm jewish and I don;t understand the the covenant bwtween Abraham and Gd to be a iteral commandment in the 21st century; we don;t sacrifice animals any more although the Bible/Torah is filled with descriptions of all the horrible things that happened to high priests and all the othrs who didn; follo the exactprocedure for the Holies of Holies.
I'm Jewish and anti circ. I find the tone here really strident and off-puting. I;ve ehard the same defense f corportal punishment of children...the fact is, the nervous system of "my baby" isn;t mne...it;s m baby's. those of us who choose not o inflict unnecessary pain r virtually immutable changes are, at elast most of the time, acting on our own moral judgment, which often stems from the same surces as deeply held religious convictions. I don;t like seeing anyone's butt get whacked. I don;t like seeing the tip of anyone's penis excised. some would argue that ur chidlren are not :ours" to do whatever we wish, but I really have had people tell me that if it;s "their" child, i;s "their" right to smack the child for any o a number of supposed offenses...and yes, the Bible praises this too in places, jsut as it praises slavery.
">> Would I be considered ignorant for not respecting someone religion when I don't think it's a good enough reason to mutilate a baby's penis?<<
In a word, yes.
For Jews, circumcision represents the covenant with Abraham and G-d. In Islam, hadith also mentions circumcision and many Muslims are also circumcised. So are a lot of Orthodox Christians and Copts.
Not your baby. Not your beliefs."
I did say before that intactivists shoor themswelves in the foot sometiems with their own stridency, unfortunately; people get defensive whenyou all them "mutilators" and "abusers." I recommend the gentle aproach John RObbins takes explaining his vegan practices to meat eaters.."I understand that what you feel amtters to you, because I once felt the same. I know that some very good people have chosen o circumcise their children, for reasons that make sense to them. and I do feel it's time to learn anther way." there are alternative baby blessings to welcome chidlren, male and female, into ha Amo Yisrael.
except for the most strictly observant of Orthodox Jews, let's face it, most jewish people don;t follow all the mitvot, so i do find it a bi specious to grab on circumcising briot milah as if it is the one thing that makes us jewish...do you follow every dietary law? avoid all work on the Sabbath? celebrate Havdallah to end the Sabbath every week? cut yor hair and trim your fingernails only in accordance with jewish law? never mix linen and woll? the list goes on and on, quite frankly...
hey, in the jewish community where I worship, a lay leader brught a evice into the community that is used by rabbis, and others in our largely lay congregation,for men who never had the ritual brit whether they are hospital circumcised or not. it;s some little spring-loaded contraption that draws THREE DROPS of blood for the certificate and satisfies the commandment for circumcision. there you go...THREE DROPS and it;s perfectly acceptable to the Gd these people understand to have an dult hoose this of his own free will to be welcomed into the community...soif that;s so, why not leave the little babies who really don;t know why theya re being carved up ALONE and let them decide to do this convenanting ceremony that ony requires a nick when they are adolescents (Bar Mitzvah age?) or adult enough to understand what theya re choosing?
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Tue, November 4, 2008 - 2:42 PMi am jewish and anti-circ too as a result of the horror of my son's circumcision. unfortunately it is too late for my son. i would do almost anything to take it back. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Wed, November 5, 2008 - 9:38 AMMy mother's side of my family is jewish, and all circ-ed their boys. I did not, and my mom was very upset. Although I don't understand it, considering she does not doing anything else jewish now. (I think of her as jew-ISH!!) I am so glad that I stood my ground. I agree that a boy should make the choice for himself. Although I can't imagine a 13 year old boy asking to have that done... but maybe that is saying something about doing it them without their permission! -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Wed, November 5, 2008 - 11:55 AMSimply put, "religion" has justified many horrors and brutalities throughout the ages.
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: circumcision and religion
Wed, November 5, 2008 - 4:54 PM. are you planning on launching a campaign against circ? do you want to educate your family and friends about circ? are you going to demonize friends family and strangers that have? i don't think circ is the act of mutalating a penis. i mean geez they remove the foreskin. not cut off their cock. female circumsion cuts of the clitoris and girls die from the infection world of difference. it's more like unesasary wisdom teeth removal.
while i dont think i would circ, i would never demonize someone who did. my father wasn't circ and chose to as an adult he was horrified that i wouldnt circ a son.
what im trying to say is you wouldn't come off as ignorant for not acceptaing someones beliefs you would come off like an asshole, if you phrase yourself they way you did here. so tread lightly when discussing a delicate subject like this to a dear friend. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Wed, November 5, 2008 - 5:27 PM<<what im trying to say is you wouldn't come off as ignorant for not acceptaing someones beliefs you would come off like an asshole,>>
Wow, just wow.
Is that really necessary? -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Wed, November 5, 2008 - 10:27 PM"Is that really necessary?"
Maybe not, but it seems like an honest response to the original poster's comment that circumcision is "mutilating a baby's penis." I like my mutilated penis just fine, thanks. Most all of my friends growing up had mutilated penises. One friend didn't and chose to get it mutilated when he was 13. Go figure. I didn't bother to mutilate my son's penis because it seemed unnecessary. I'm not sure if he agrees with the decision.
So, how about those mutilated earlobes, toxic face paints, and needle-scarified skin? You all enjoying those? -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Wed, November 5, 2008 - 10:41 PMYes, it was an honest response but there are ways to deliver honest opinions without being a jerk about it.
And there isn't any reason to take it so personally that someone sees circumcision differently than you do.
Just for argument's sake would you consider it mutilation if the little toe was cut off? Most people would say yes, that is a form of mutilation. What if it was just cutting off a piece of an ear lobe? So what is the difference between cutting off a different part of the body and cutting of a piece of penis? Whether you see it as mutilation or not is for you to decide but it is hardly realistic to act offended that other people consider cutting off a piece of a small boys body a form of mutilation. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 2:29 AMYou didn't laugh even a little? Oh well. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 7:03 AMOh, but Chris....I laughed. :)
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 10:49 AMthis is getting way off the religious topic. I'm Jewish and anti-circ. as for whether a child would choose to have th ritual three drops of blood drwn later in life...hey, as a society we are low on teen initiation rites, except in gang life, so kids often choose to have piercings and tattoos. I was at a Hannukah party where a man, our host fot he evening, had officially been "converted" within the minyan to which we belong, and he was really proud of the spring-loaded prick-nick he go. when yo know what you are signing up for, it's a whole different ball game than inflicting it on an infant, and the act is many Jewish males babies are hospital circumcised and never has the bris anyway..so it's the blessing that counts. and yes, I'll argue that one out with anyone who wants to tell me I;m not Jewish enough, or this somehow makes me a "self-hating Jew." (I''ve listened to both these accusations most of my life. and I have so far resisted the temptation to say,"self hate? no, I like myself, it's you I can't stand.")
as for the "mutilation" discussion: what did I say...this topic brings up SO much defensiveness and pain in some many people, whether they are male or female, circed or intact, or pro or anti-circ.
when are we going to learn to talk with each other?
I;ve been wanting to write an article or essay for some years now called "for intactivists: how to be a good friend to a circumcised man."
hint the first: i honestly think wods ike "mutilation" get us into trouble.since I'm female, i can only imagine that were I a man who had been circumcised in infancy, I;d prefer not to have anyone, male or female, look at my prick and say,"oh, how sad, you;ve been mutilated!"
some men DO feel mutilated and deserve compassion and support for how they feel.some don't and they get, well, defensive. I eprsoanlly dislike people making remarks about any part of my body and think it's a sign of insensitivity.
if you are lovers wih a man (I speak to both men and women here), better find a way to find his prick beautiful. it;d be a stupid reason to break off a relationship but seriously if you are so shallow for this ti make a major differnce...i isn;t much of a relationship anyway and he is better off without you.
I know one woman who I think is a bit masochistic some other ways, and it sounds like her husband has some real emotional problems 9which Iwon;t blame entirely n beingcircumcised either. there are a lot of ways to get crazy through life, not just having part of your dick cut off. I;ve known some pretty difficul tguys who wer intact too, so it's no guaranrantee, believe me!) anyway, she almost DIED of complications from IUD use. she explained her choice...her "poor circed husband" has so little sensation in his penis anyway, it would be "really hard on him" to use condoms.
now that's sentimental masochism, as I say...no one, circed or not, has ever developed a life-threatening infection from using condoms (okay, latex allergy can be serious but that's another m,ater)...yes,better not to circ in the first place I still think but you get my point.
incidentally, I;m also not going to say that uncircumcised lovers are always more sensitive and bettter to be with than circed guys...I don;t want to sound like the slut of the universe because I'm not, but let's say I;ve had enough experience of both 'styles" to say there is no onetoone correspondence.
bottom line: treat his penis, and his feelings about his penis, with respect if you care about a man. same goes for a woman and HER genitals. -
-
Unsu...
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 11:38 AMi think you got to take anything on the internets with a grain of salt. plus i didnt call her an asshole i said she would come off as an asshole. like how i came off as one. see!
mutalating is an even harsher word than asshole when talking about someones junk. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 2:00 PMAnd I think you should not assume everyone is going to take things with a grain of salt when they read your posts. And if you see words like mutilation and they bug you then perhaps you should consider taking it with the same grain of salt you are recommending.
You think mutilation is a harsher word than asshole. I do not. Fine we disagree, but the original poster posted a discussion and there is no reason for anyone to enter the discussion with guns blazing. We all have opinions on the matter. Circumcision along with vaccinations are always hot button issues in the parenting tribes so no need to amp it up even more with expletives. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 2:21 PM**POP** Can of worms open!!
I am going to have to disagree. The person that started this thread did NOT come here for advice. She started off on the wrong foot by pretty much damning those who choose to circumcise their son.
I have pretty much avoided this thread but now I'm getting a little ticked. It seems as if it's ok for people to come in here and rant and rave about how wrong vaccines are and how wrong and horrible circumcision is. But what about those of us that don't feel that way. I choose to vaccinate my kids and I also chose to circumcise my son when he was born. I have no regrets about either and I have the most amazing children who have had zero health or psychiatric issues of any kind.
I also disagree with the term "mutilation" in describing circumcision. It has been proven that it can reduce all sorts of penile health issues as one gets older. I also feel that it is much easier to keep clean and free of bacterial infections. I have never nor have any of my friends who circumcise their sons have never had to deal with penile bacterial infections. But, since I have been on tribe here I have seen at least three threads about bacterial infections.
It's also a misnomer to compare female circumcision to male circumcision. If we were to ask 100 men and 100 women who were circumcised I am betting there would be a HUGE difference in how they feel about it. Female circumcision is a MUCH different procedure with a very different outcome.
I am a smart, educated woman and I do take offense in being told I have mutilated my son. I researched it thoroughly before making the decision and I feel like it was a very educated and thought out choice. I watched the procdedure and he didn't even cry. YES, a child can be circumcised and not even cry. It took less than 5 minutes and the doctor did a beautiful job. I was very happy with it.
I vehemently disagree with what's being said in this thread and I think it's really none of anyone's business what we choose to do or not to do when it comes to circumcision. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 2:58 PMI never stated the original poster came here for advice. She came here for discussion. Yes, she obviously has a strong opinion on the subject. A lot of us do. Whether or not you are comfortable with the word mutilation doesn't make it any less so in the eyes of some others. Some people consider body piercing or tattooing mutilation, who gets to tell them that they are wrong for feeling that way?
If you are getting ticked perhaps step back and check and see if you aren't feeling defensive. There is nothing in this thread to suggest that anyone can't post their opinion without being pissed off.
And let's be clear, I did not compare female and male circumcision, I simply asked where the line is drawn. See, not everyone agrees on the big difference between female and male circumcision. I agree that they are utterly different but I also can see how some people see them as similar because both involve a whole lot of pain for the person on the receiving end and both are usually done to minors who get no say in the matter. So yeah, I ask where is the line drawn when we say it is because of religion?
I don't pretend to have any answers because I feel my decision on this was my own and other parent's decisions are theirs but that doesn't mean people who have strong opinions on either side of this issue shouldn't be able to say exactly how they feel without suggesting someone is an asshole because they have a different approach to the whole issue. -
-
Unsu...
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 5:18 PMi think the idea of my post is completely lost on you. i dont feel argumentative.
do people even know what mutalation means!?! people who consider tatoos mutalation would come off as an asshole if they went up to a tattooed person and said that they had mutalated their bodies. srsly!
my post wasn't even directed at you or meant to be rude as you think it was. i'm just straight forward and people need to take internet drivel with a grain of salt because there is NO tone of voice!!! seriously. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 5:41 PM<<people who consider tatoos mutalation would come off as an asshole if they went up to a tattooed person and said that they had mutalated their bodies. srsly! >>
Well, if anyone one went up to anyone and told them their unsolicited opinions about them (on any subject) then sure, anyone could define that as being an asshole. However that isn't what happened in this thread. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 5:49 PMI just want to point out that the original post wasn't asking whether or not anyone thought circumcision was right or wrong.
She asked a question specifically about people who already say that they don't believe in it and yet make an exception for religion. I can see how she has questions about this. It can be puzzling to understand why someone would decide that something is right or wrong but then make an exception for religion. Not everyone understands or has experienced the role religion plays in some people's lives. So she came and asked questions. And yes, she obviously had an opinion already but that doesn't mean this is less of an opportunity for meaningful discussion.
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 5:52 PM"Well, if anyone one went up to anyone and told them their unsolicited opinions about them (on any subject) then sure, anyone could define that as being an asshole. However that isn't what happened in this thread."
I'm sorry is it just me? That statement is complete bullshit. It's pasted all over this thread about how circumcision is mutilation. If I told you in a thread I thought parents who didn't vaccinate were selfish and irresponsible, and someone who read that didn't vaccinate their child they would find that offensive. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 5:58 PMNo, it is not bullshit and there isn't any reason to be that rude about it. Really.
LOL! That has been posted about vaccinations many times, in this very tribe even. Vaccinations and circumcision are always hot button issues. I just feel if one can't read the threads without getting upset that someone has a radically different perspective, then one should consider skipping the threads because unlike someone coming up to your face a thread can easily be ignored.
The fact is she posted a thread. She didn't get up in anyone's face. She simply a started a discussion.
-
-
-
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 7:20 PMSnazzy, I'm glad it went well for you and your son.
I agree with you. The propaganda is annoying. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 7:29 PMThanks, Chris. ;)
-
-
Unsu...
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 11:00 PMyew i dont even know you. i seriously just posted my opnionions and you thought i wasn't playing nice! i keep trying to explain that it wasn't meant the way you are taking it. seriously!
anyhoo, i don' t think it's right to have a double standard. if you are anti circ be anti circ. but, i think you should be respectful of someones choice wether or not it is religious. snazzy gina really did her research and while i'd hate to admit it shes right about all the penis puss posts.
where do we draw the line? i think we draw the line at cutting off clits with rusty razorblades? dont you?
maybe circ is an outdated jewish tradition but there are pros and cons for both sides. what gerard said about traditions are true. there was a reason they didnt eat pork and there was a reason they circ'd and it had more to do with health than god, but back then it was easier to use the fear of god and a covenant than explaining the poros. "because god said so" now for some it is a tradition and now for some it is because the pros for them outweighed the cons! -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Thu, November 6, 2008 - 11:21 PM<<if you are anti circ be anti circ. but, i think you should be respectful of someones choice wether or not it is religious. snazzy gina really did her research and while i'd hate to admit it shes right about all the penis puss posts. >>
You seem to be talking as if you have read a post where I somehow criticized Gina's or anyone else's choice to have their child circumcised? Can you please tell me what I wrote that even remotely suggests that I have questioned her decision or anyone else's?
In fact I already posted this: "I don't pretend to have any answers because I feel my decision on this was my own and other parent's decisions are theirs but that doesn't mean people who have strong opinions on either side of this issue shouldn't be able to say exactly how they feel without suggesting someone is an asshole because they have a different approach to the whole issue."
All that I am saying is that the poster didn't start a thread about whether or not circumcision is wrong or right. She started a thread about why some people who *already* disagree with circumcision make exceptions for religion. So I asked a rhetorical question about where we draw the line when it comes to religion because THIS would be the thread to ask those questions in.
Sure you feel the line is drawn at rusty razors but there are others who feel the line is somewhere else. I am interested in hearing several perspectives on it.
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 7:22 AMWhen we do thorough research on the subject, we learn that all of the old doctors' tales about the supposed medical benefits of male circumcision have been debunked. No medical organization in the world recommends routine infant circumcision, for either gender.
Even if we do see some yeast issues with intact boys, we still don't see them as much as with girls. And nobody in the USA is advocating the removal of labia to prevent these minor, treatable issues.
The foreskin is a working part. It exists for a reason, as with every other part of our bodies. I wonder if anyone would believe our eyeballs would be easier to clean if we removed eyelids at birth? To me, having grown up in a family where surgery is not done without true need, removing eyelids is no more disturbing than removing foreskins. Except eyelids are loose from birth, not tightly adhered to the most richly sensitive part of the body (not to mention packed full of nerve endings, the way the foreskin is)
The "cleaner" argument is so bizarre to me. Newborn penises are as simple to clean as fingers. Nothing complicated. By the time the skin loosens up and has moving parts, the boy is old enough to be showering alone. And you just try to tell him NOT to wash himself there.
I go through all of this common knowledge to illustrate a point I wish to make: "Mutilate" is an appropriate word.
mu·ti·late
1. To deprive of a limb or an essential part; cripple.
2. To disfigure by damaging irreparably: mutilate a statue.
3. To make imperfect by excising or altering parts.
Which reminds me, nobody who questions infant circumcision is going to say a bad word to a circumcised man. (unless he's a jerk ;)
We take issue with the life-altering choices adults make for babies. We speak for the right of the child to his or her own bodily integrity. For his or her basic rights. Many men I grew up with were cut as babies. Many don't even know why they have that big weird scar- they think penises are somehow created with scar tissue. It serves nobody to keep secrets.
I believe that every child has the same rights, regardless of the origins of the beliefs of his or her parents.
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 9:41 AM"We take issue with the life-altering choices adults make for babies. We speak for the right of the child to his or her own bodily integrity. For his or her basic rights. Many men I grew up with were cut as babies. Many don't even know why they have that big weird scar- they think penises are somehow created with scar tissue. It serves nobody to keep secrets.
I believe that every child has the same rights, regardless of the origins of the beliefs of his or her parents."
Who is the "WE" you are referring to??
Wow, so you are pretty much saying that I have ill will for my child and that I don't care for him. That keeping his foreskin is a "right" and that I have done him wrong in some way. You have a LOT of nerve. And, I'm sorry but Yewnie this is no longer a discussion. Fixit Fox is preaching...not "discussing."
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 10:24 AMThe "we" I meant is in the sentence that came before:
"Which reminds me, nobody *****who questions infant circumcision***** is going to say a bad word to a circumcised man."
I'm pretty much interested in Saratonin's original question. I wonder if she's still around here. I get the feeling she posted this topic assuming that people interested in Attachment Parenting would all have the same basic opinion of infant circumcision, with only religion being a possible point of contention.
If you want me to say it directly, again, Yes, I believe a child has the right to keep all of his or her body parts.
I'm not going to pretend to know anything about where you're coming from, Gina,
but I'm sure that anyone who circumcises does so out of a belief that there is value in doing so.
I'm here to help point out the other side of the story. It's a complicated one. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 1:06 PMYou assumed wrong.
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 1:42 PMwow! what what what!?! i didnt say you said anything about gina! i was using her as an example of someone who circ'ed not based on religion but based on their own feeling from their research. i respect her desicion, so for me it isnt a question of religion or non religion. the original post was about why is it okay to accept circ for religion but not when for personal reasons. my OPINION is that it's not okay to have a double standard. a parents conviction is strong wether it is for religious reasons or personal reasons.
i dont expect you to agree with me, but i would appreciate it if you stopped reading my posts and interpreting them as personal attacks! i would love to just disscuss the topic. i know my first post tottally came off wrong and not how i intended and i have spent three posts trying to explain that!!
as for where we draw the line. perhaps yes that choice is individual. for you it is with cutting of the foreskin. where we draw the line as a society is a really touchy subject.
what i had said previously is that circ as a covenant and commanded by god was more than just that it was for hygeine reasons at a time when the hebrew people were nomadic. many people choose to circ for those reasons and their conviction is just as strong as some jews and even as strong as against. it would be really hard to make it illegal the way female "circ" is. since female circ is done for similiar reasons footbinding was done.
hopefully this one doesn't come off argumentavely because thats not my intention. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 1:59 PM<<i dont expect you to agree with me, but i would appreciate it if you stopped reading my posts and interpreting them as personal attacks! i would love to just disscuss the topic. i know my first post tottally came off wrong and not how i intended and i have spent three posts trying to explain that!! >>
And I would appreciate it if you would stop telling me what my opinion is when clearly the only personal opinion I have posted so far is this: "I don't pretend to have any answers because I feel my decision on this was my own and other parent's decisions are theirs"
And yet you are posting shit like this to me: <<if you are anti circ be anti circ. but, i think you should be respectful of someones choice wether or not it is religious. snazzy gina really did her research and while i'd hate to admit it shes right about all the penis puss posts. >>
So please, stop talking to me as if I need you to tell me to be respectful of someone's choice as if when I have very clearly posted my feeling that it is a personal choice. -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 2:19 PMYou know?
I feel like this exchange has been rather heated and nothing has been accomplished. It's really hard to talk over a forum about decisions that are so personal and emotional.
I don't want to make this an environment that people won't feel safe in. It's just hard when I feel like the odd man out and that I'm being attacked for choices I believe are the very best for me and my family.
Obviously I shouldn't even BE a part of this tribe because I don't stand on the same side as everyone as far as circumcision is concerned. Hmmm...I didn't know that was a requirement for believing in attached parenting...
I'm sad that no one else can see that there is an obvious attack on my personal choices as a parent. I'm not a stupid person. I'm educated and well read. I have amazing children and I love them so much. Just as much as everyone else in here.
And my feelings are hurt. I feel misunderstood. It really sucks that mothers can't be more supportive of each other no matter what their personal choices may be. :(
-
-
Unsu...
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 3:13 PMargh! the second paragraph was you as in general you not you as in yoonie or yewnie. i wasn't stating that you felt that way.
i hope i cleared up that confusion.
*not opening mouth anymore* -
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 5:59 PMgetting back to the original question: I think there is a tradition of "religious exemption" on many issues. Christian Scientists, for example, have fought HARD in the courts for their rights to rely on prayer alone rather than medical procedures to prevent or even cure illnesses and injuries, but it is legally recognized. in schools hwere hats are prohibited in the classroom, children whose religious practices demand a head covering (this includes observant Jews, Sihks, many Muslims among others) are permitted to wear their traditional scarves, caps, or turbans. peope in the military whose religious beliefs demand they avoid certain foods (for example meat, or certain meats such as in observant jewish kosher or Islamic halal,) are accommodated.
so it does make sense that we are careful when someone's religious practice dictates something we otherwise disapprove. as a jewish person, I feel i can question the literal reliance on the Hol duty to circumcise..but it doesm honestly,m irk me when people who are not jewish and know little about the culture or the religion want to slam Jews and Jewish tradition bceause it "promotes circumcision"...sometimes this is based on ignorance and prejudice. there is sti;ll a lot of antijewish sentiment out there, and I sometimes find myself right in the middle, feeling I can ask some serious questions of my people';s traditions but I don;t appreciate people outside with little knowledge telling me I am "bad." like the proverbial middle of the roader getting hit by vehicles on both sides...I've taken a bit of flak on this one.
so for the record...I'm anti-circ. I don;t use words like "mutilation" about it, because inflammaroty language really stifles any meaningful dialogue. I'd rather my more observant friends all decided to do an alternative baby blessing, but I won;t reject them as friends or as worthwhile humans for doing something that makes me sad. I'd prefer they didn't criticize me for being "not Jewish enough" for making this choice.
I'm over 50 (how'd that happen? eeek!), have rather radical political and cultural views, and have learned that I have to live in a world where we don;t all think the same, eat the same food, or raise our children the same way.
-
-
Re: circumcision and religion
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 6:04 PM<<It's just hard when I feel like the odd man out and that I'm being attacked for choices I believe are the very best for me and my family. >>
I'm honestly trying to understand why you are feeling like you are the odd man out when there are at least three other people besides yourself in this thread that have posted with similar thoughts to yours and some have spoken up to support your posts.
<<Obviously I shouldn't even BE a part of this tribe because I don't stand on the same side as everyone as far as circumcision is concerned.>>
Again, not everyone is on the same side on this issue in this tribe and definitely not in this thread and you seem to be not acknowledging this.
<<I'm sad that no one else can see that there is an obvious attack on my personal choices as a parent. I'm not a stupid person. I'm educated and well read. I have amazing children and I love them so much. Just as much as everyone else in here. >>
I find it sad that you chose to feel attacked just because some people feel differently about something. I didn't see anyone single you out and tell you that you are a bad mother. People posted about THEIR feelings, not your mothering.
<<And my feelings are hurt. I feel misunderstood. It really sucks that mothers can't be more supportive of each other no matter what their personal choices may be. :( >>
Hey, ditto. I feel like I have tried to use polite language and be respectful. I don't feel the same curtiousy was returned. I have made a point of saying that I think it is a personal choice. But that hasn't been at all acknowledged. Instead you seem to be deciding that everyone is against you just because they don't all have the same beliefs as you. That is extremely unfair. Having a different opinion isn't being non-supportive of you as a mother and it doesn't mean anyone is against you. Some of us are completely capable of having our opinions while still respecting that a differing opinion exists. -
-
hmmm
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 8:11 PMWell,
are you being nice now?
No.
You are making all sorts of assumptions about how I'm feeling and why I'm feeling that way.
No, I'm not feeling like I WANT you all to agree with me. It just sucks to be in a place and have people telling me (not YOU) fixit fox that I have mutilated and harmed my child. I'm not saying anything about how I feel about those who choose not to circ. I just feel like it's a very hostile place in here and those who circ aren't welcomed or even heard. At all. It's simply clear that there are opinions that are one sided and there really IS no room for discussion.
I'm honestly NOT referring to you Yewnie. I went back and re read the whole thing and you just piped up at the first offhand comment. And, while it seemed to just escalate, it got out of hand. -
-
Re: hmmm
Fri, November 7, 2008 - 9:31 PM<<are you being nice now?
No. >>
Well, I guess I've just given back what I feel I have received.
<<I just feel like it's a very hostile place in here and those who circ aren't welcomed or even heard. At all. It's simply clear that there are opinions that are one sided and there really IS no room for discussion. >>
Well, you can feel that way and I won't tell you not to but it completely ignores that there are other posters in this thread who's posts are in agreement with yours so obviously there IS room for others to be heard and not a single person has told them or you that they aren't welcome here.
There is plenty of room for discussion but one would have to be willing to take a deep breath, slow down and even step back if you are feeling angry or hurt.
Yes, some people feel circumcision is mutilation. That is how they feel. You can't change that. We all have issues that we feel strongly about and none of us can tailor our feelings on this issues for anyone else. For instance: personally I mostly feel boob jobs and most other plastic surgeries are a form of self mutilation but one of my best friends has had a boob job, a nose job and a tummy tuck. She knows what I feel about those types of things. She knows I would never do it myself but she also knows that I respect her right to make her own decisions. There are so many issues in life where people can feel strongly and yet find a way to still respect one another.
Some people think it is irresponsible for me to have an alternative vaccination schedule. They have more traditional approaches. I can't let myself get bothered by their opinions because I have to decide what works for me. Ironically since I do vaccinate (some of them anyway) I have also been on the receiving end of people criticizing any sort of vaccination. But I feel it is good to remind myself that they aren't criticizing me personally, rather they are expressing their critical thinking on a particular subject that they feel strongly about. Their opinion would be what it is whether or not I was around so obviously it is not about me. -
-
Re: hmmm
Sat, November 8, 2008 - 7:10 AMYewniferous, Well said:
"But I feel it is good to remind myself that they aren't criticizing me personally, rather they are expressing their critical thinking on a particular subject that they feel strongly about. Their opinion would be what it is whether or not I was around so obviously it is not about me." -
-
Re: hmmm
Sat, November 8, 2008 - 4:24 PMI actually was thinking about starting a similar thread...
You see, half my family is Jewish. (There are also family members who are Catholic, Religious Science, various Christian faiths, and a few Buddhists...) And I don't want to alienate them with my choices (and that of my expectant son's father) on this matter. We have decided to NOT circumcise our son. (Before I always figured that I would have my son(s) look as their father does, but the more I have researched this, the more uncomfortable I feel about making that choice for my child(ren). They can always have it done later in life, but you can't undo the act...)
I would like to appeal to the logic and wisdom of the religious aspects of the Jewish members of my family (like my brother, who is orthodox- but has tattoos and smokes pot) rather than bring in emotional reasons that show a lack of tolerance and acceptance of the beliefs of others in the confines of their homes and immediate families. That my family chooses to observe some, but not all Jewish laws, shows that I might have a good chance to help them accept my choices for my own children.
Are there any more arguments (though I am not sure that is the best word in this situation) that support Jews, or other religions, choosing to go against old doctrine(s)? (And WHERE does a non-practitioner go to find out what the doctrines actually say with out having to take conversion classes or reading testaments line by line?) I am hoping to honor the spirit of my family's different beliefs without mocking or offending them, while still staying true to my own beliefs and choices. (Kind of like my Dad drives to temple on Friday nights and turns on lights on the Sabbath...)
How does one respect the meaning of the religion, without following each and every act? Especially when it comes to something that is so (apparently, obviously, deeply) passionately explosive? -
-
Re: hmmm
Sat, November 8, 2008 - 6:43 PMI love the idea of Brit Shalom- it's the whole ceremony with family, but without the surgery part.
Very much like the traditional naming ceremony for girls.
It seems like a great way to embrace the best of both sides of the coin.
-
Re: hmmm
Sat, November 8, 2008 - 7:40 PMI recommend Ronald Goldman's book "Questioning CIrcumcision: a Jewish Perspective." search it out on the Web. he ha some other books. thre are a few groups doing alternate non-cutting baby blessings. some anticirc groups give it out for free, but I'm not sure who has them now.
I'm too tired to write a whole lot now, so will close here.good luck on all of this. -
-
Unsu...
Re: hmmm
Mon, November 10, 2008 - 10:33 AMHow does one respect the meaning of the religion, without following each and every act? Especially when it comes to something that is so (apparently, obviously, deeply) passionately explosive? >>>
well respect goes both ways jewisg GP of jewish babies should understand that u want whats best for your son, just tell them your son can choose to be part of the covenant with god when hes older, you can still observe other tradfitions to teach him his heritage.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-